RavenousGopher

I say alot of dumb shit, and do even dumber shit. I base all of my reviews on peronal enjoyment, not on objective quality so sorry If I rate some dogshit stuff as god teir or vice versa. For me, a 5 is a really enjoyable read that made a lasting impression on me, a 4.5 is time well spent that I'd love to go back and re-read, a 4 is pretty good, but basically average. A 3.5 is slightly less than average and just not my type of read, a 3 is somthing that I didn't really enjoy all that much and wish I didn't read. A 2.5 is a series i think is actual shit, and anything below that is somthing that I genuinely dislike. I don't view my opinions as innately correct or something pretentious so feel free to disagree with me and call me an idiot If I spew some baseless drivel.