roriconfan's avatar


  • Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Joined Dec 22, 2011
  • 35 / M

Once upon a time there was a studio called SHAFT, which hired a man named Simbo Akiyuki and created one very good school comedy called Sayonara Zetsubo Sensei (SZS). It sold so well, it kept making more similar comedies, and even though none of them were as good as the first, they kept making money out of the fame they got thanks to it. And this is why we get Sasami-san at Ganbaranai at present time

What made SZS so good was the simple fact it had a character for every possible situation. They could deal with any issue they could think of thanks to it, and half the time it would even be about social criticism. All the later comedies though had a far more narrowed space to move, and without ever trying to flesh out their characters past the first dimension, or at least having a plot to keep you interested, they ended up becoming boring much sooner. This problem is inherited to their current comedy, which is about a shut-in girl. Just how long can they stretch this joke before it becomes boring; especially when SZS already had such a character? The very first episode is pretty much telling you “Not even 10 minutes.”

There are no characters in this show, unless you can call generic caricatures defined by one stereotype and one personality quirk as such. In case you do, there are 5 of them.
- One is a shut-in girl who spends her life indoors and stalks her brother with hidden cameras. She sees him as her slave and doesn’t want anyone to be interested in him; thus she is a spoiled, arrogant, selfish brocon.
- The second is said brother, a major siscon who does nothing all day besides trying to please her sister. He loves to hide his face from the camera for no real reason. Probably a parody of the faceless hero in hentai games.
- The others are three underage sisters who are all very interested in the brother. They do a lot of things to attract his attention but he is stuck to thinking only of his sister to care.
There, that was all I can say about them. Very eccentric in whatever they do based on the one and only stereotype they are made up from and absolutely nothing more. Oh, they are also supposed to be gods but this has as much importance as everything else in the show. Absolutely none.

There never was plot or development in any SHAFT comedy, and this one is following the tradition. It’s complete randomness. All you get is four underage girls messing with the life of a faceless deviant adult in a completely random succession of scenes and plots. And sure, reality keeps messing up because they are gods but this doesn’t add anything to the setting; it just excuses the randomness and shallowness. It doesn’t even attempt to criticize society or otaku culture like SZS did. In the contrary, it makes it look like it’s fun to be a hikikomori. It just oversexualized major social problems Japan faces and threw them in your face expecting you to find that funny. It isn’t.

Minimalistic, artsy, full of filters, but surely no longer that special after all the similar yet inferior to SZS comedies SHAFT made. Good voice acting, forgettable songs, the whole thing looks like a parody of hentai games.

A forgettable series. SHAFT must try something different if it wants to make money out of something else other than milking the Bakemonogatari franchise.

And now for some excused scorings.

General Artwork 2/2 (artsy)
Character Figures 1/2 (generic)
Backgrounds 2/2 (artsy)
Animation 1/2 (basic)
Visual Effects 2/2 (artsy)

Voice Acting 2/3 (silly but fitting with the feeling of the series)
Music Themes 2/4 (typical)
Sound Effects 3/3 (artsy)

Premise 2/2 (interesting)
Pacing 0/2 (random)
Complexity 1/2 (besides getting all the game and culture references, there is nothing in it)
Plausibility 0/2 (none)
Conclusion 1/2 (simple)

Presence 1/2 (generic)
Personality 2/2 (rather cheesy but well founded)
Backdrop 1/2 (generic and simplistic but it’s there)
Development 0/2 (none)
Catharsis 0/2 (none)

Historical Value 0/3 (none)
Rewatchability 1/3 (low because of too much randomness)
Memorability 1/4 (besides being artsy, there is no reason to remember it)

Art 1/1 (looks artsy)
Sound 0/2 (sounds meh)
Story 0/3 (what story?)
Characters 0/4 (they are cardboards)

VERDICT: 4.5/10

4/10 story
8/10 animation
7/10 sound
4/10 characters
4.5/10 overall
0 this review is Funny Helpful

You must be logged in to leave comments. Login or sign up today!

Tereneckla May 27, 2014

Just as you wrote in your review, you probably only watched the first 10 minutes of the first episode.

wanryavka Aug 13, 2013

You didn't even watch the show did you?  You maybe watched the first 2 or 3 eps then made this review.

kio3459 Apr 30, 2013

A++ review (very well written). I especially liked The way you summarized the characters.

DJKyzer Apr 19, 2013

I saw your review score and thought "roriconfan didn't like it but I might, though if I read his review I'll watch it and be focusing on all the negative points." - I wish I had just read your review to begin with, I struggled to find a positive in this show at all (well in the first ep anyway - it's been well and truly dropped now). Point being - Thanks again for an awesome (and accurate) review!