Canada
September 14, 2011
June 16, 2013
18 / Male
0 recommendations
total episodes: 5,219
total anime ratings: 178
total manga ratings: 15
Hey there is no point in arguing with roriconfan
he is extremely stubborn
Then let's just say I don't like fake intelligent anime. I get too critical of things they don't care to explain and along the way the eventually do cause plot holes because of them.
And because of you I also edited several mistakes of Mirai Nikki in the review in an attempt to make them more understood.
We reached a kind of Dead End in our arguement, lol. So I will turn this to something more theoretical. A director/author does not have to explain every single thing that happens because:
1) it is not important. It would be a waste of time to do so.
2) it is important but he deliberately didn't mention it so to leave the viewer/reader to think about it.
3) it is important but he didn't think it needed further explaining and so its meaning was left vague.
In the case of Mirai Nikki I say it was #3 but you say it was #2. All I have to back my claim is that this is a shitty show full of brainless actions and senseless motivations, in a story aimed at retarded viewers/readers. There is no way I would find so many mistakes if it was an elaborate work. For example, I will barely find a few mistakes in Death Note and those would be towards the end.
"your forcing your own logic on to this show. You assume that just because there's a certain aspect in a show, such as the police, or parents, that they should behave in exactly the same way as they do in your personal life. But that's something you shouldn't be assuming."
I am assuming what the show is telling me. If there is a thing called the police, i will assume it is like my own police, unless stated to be a completely different task force with its own in-laws. So if someone writes "lightsaber" I will of course assume he means a sword made of light and not an easy to lift tooth. It was never explained if the police did something different than our polise so of course the viewer assumes the obvious. So as you can see, I am right and you are wrong.
"Fourth was still on Yuki's side, and didn't care about becoming a god."
He couldn't quit either and eventually it would be his turn to die. Not saving it.
"there's no telling that the police ever bothered contacting parents in the first place due to Fourth's influence."
"It is possible that he did leave a few dogs in his house"
First you tell me not to assume anything and then you go on assuming all that crap. When I do it is wrong, when you do it is fine. Thanks for contradicting yourself.
"Anyways, like I said before I most likely won't respond after this, but you're free to give your counter arguments if you so wish."
I understand, you want to stop because you realized you are making a fool out of yourself for defending this bullshit series. Or am I assuming again too much? Ok, I will let you assume what you think is right since it appears you do it right and I am not.
Konnichiwa!
First of all, thank you for reading and commenting on my Black Rock Shooter review.
Secondly, I think I see what you mean, but I'll have to disagree. To me it felt like the plot went right where it wanted to go. Probably because, after the OVA, the TV series perfectly met my expectations of what it had to concentrate on. I personally love psychological stuff (my all-time favourite anime is Evangelion for a reason), and I liked the idea of a physical, parallel-world representation of the characters' painful experiences, and the idea of "someone taking your pain" to let you live without it, making you forget it when this someone dies. It made me remember what I studied about the Freudian repression in high school. I do see its defects and what could have been developed better, but it gave me a surprisingly strong emotional impact.
Wow, it's the second time I had to defend my opinion for liking something someone else seems to hate, normally I am the one hating what everyone likes! XD