Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2 - Page 2 - Anime-Planet forum
Why register?

make an anime and manga list, and more! all free!

Theme

Go Back   Anime-Planet forum > Site Information > Site Announcements

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2009, 10:40 PM   #11 (permalink)
MY DNA IS MADE UP OF ANIME
 
wolfangel87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 26
Posts: 3,576
Send a message via AIM to wolfangel87 Send a message via MSN to wolfangel87
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

I think that it is a really good idea to warn people about the content. I think that the idea you have now with the tags would work splendidly!
__________________
One of The Holy Two of Coffee, Prophetess Wolfangel


Thanks to Rock for my awesome signature!
wolfangel87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 01:19 AM   #12 (permalink)
MY DNA IS MADE UP OF ANIME
 
VivisQueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 28
Posts: 8,974
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

I kinda object to shounen-ai/shoujo-ai being under Explicit Content parent tag when they blatantly are not.

More suitable under 'Mature Themes'. Just because it's homosexuality, doesn't mean it's explicit. You even make that distinction yourself, but still propose to put it alongside other tags like gore, explicit sex etc. :/
__________________

Check out my podcast - Nakama Britannica - latest episode is a review of Angel Beats!
VivisQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 01:34 AM   #13 (permalink)
Otaku
 
Menchi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Finland
Age: 22
Posts: 2,996
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

Yes, and in most of shounen/shoujo-ai anime I've watched (and same for manga) there's only been kissing and hugging and that sort of 'mild' stuff, so I'd like it under the Mature Themes-tag as well.

And the idea about the warning signs sounds good, cause kiddies could get into trouble if they even accidentally click open something not-suitable for them, and their parents would think this is not the right site for them...
__________________



Menchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 05:24 AM   #14 (permalink)
POPEE BELIEVER
 
cassiesheepgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Age: 27
Posts: 3,297
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

I think that the reason it's under explicit is more because it's a child of Yaoi, so then anyone who clicks on yaoi will also see the shounen-ai tags. I agree that shounen-ai isn't explicit, and the definition of the tag also explains that shounen-ai is male/male relationships with little to no sexual content.
__________________



Know a manga that's the same as the anime? We need your help!

Help add to the DB: Anime | Manga

More Cults and Claims
cassiesheepgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 06:25 AM   #15 (permalink)
MY DNA IS MADE UP OF ANIME
 
VivisQueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 28
Posts: 8,974
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassiesheepgirl View Post
I think that the reason it's under explicit is more because it's a child of Yaoi, so then anyone who clicks on yaoi will also see the shounen-ai tags. I agree that shounen-ai isn't explicit, and the definition of the tag also explains that shounen-ai is male/male relationships with little to no sexual content.
Shounen-ai isn't meaningfully related to yaoi. It'd be like saying romance is a child of porn: so anyone who wants to see male-female relationships can click on porn and then by default also find romance.
__________________

Check out my podcast - Nakama Britannica - latest episode is a review of Angel Beats!
VivisQueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 10:03 AM   #16 (permalink)
Overlord
 
sothis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Age: 32
Posts: 15,988
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

as PC as you want to make it, shounen ai is seen as yaoi without sex - that's just how it is. as i mentioned above i understand putting a genre under explicit is a bit unorthodox, but it would be under yaoi/yuri because they are children topics.

i mean, let's look at this realistically: if i'm looking up yaoi, theres a very, very good chance i'm looking for shounen ai too (especially with english meanings where the two terms are merged). many, many people consider 'yaoi' to be the blanket term that defines male/male anything, sex or not.

the one thing i could potentially do is make an exception for showing all children tags under the parent tags - what i mean is:

if i look at the yaoi tag page, ill see shounen ai titles as well (because i dont think anyone can possibly argue they dont fit well together)

if i look at explicit content, it will show yaoi/yuri and the sub tag nudity, but can exclude shounen ai / shoujo ai because they admittedly are not explicit.
__________________

Anime-Planet.com - anime | manga | reviews

Adding Anime - Synopsis Templates | Twitter | MySpace

[sixth sense voice] I SEE BRITISH PEOPLE - Control my signature or avatar!
sothis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 12:10 PM   #17 (permalink)
Overlord
 
sothis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Age: 32
Posts: 15,988
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

if that logic applies, that works for me... id just need a list of which ones qualify as hentai so i know what to look for when i add them (or i cuold potentially post a sticky thread of sources we wont post manga from)
__________________

Anime-Planet.com - anime | manga | reviews

Adding Anime - Synopsis Templates | Twitter | MySpace

[sixth sense voice] I SEE BRITISH PEOPLE - Control my signature or avatar!
sothis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 04:40 PM   #18 (permalink)
Anime Fan in Training
 
babbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 175
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zakiel View Post
It should more or less apply. You can always make exceptions. I guess the technical term for "hentai magazine" is Seijin (for adult men) magazines. There's also Redikomi, which is "for adult women", but it doesn't list any magazines. There are also lists for Yaoi and Yuri magazines on the site, but I don't know how explicit the magazines are.

Here's a list of Seijin magazines

I'm not sure if all of the publishers of Seijin manga exclusively publish Seijin manga. If so, it could listed by publisher as well, because MU lists the the publisher far more often than the magazine serialized in.
Well if it's scanslated (and I'm assuming that the majority of the people here don't know japanese and posting stuff they've read online or bought) the scanslator will prolly be a good indicator as well. Most groups tend to stay in particular genres. If they did only translate a handful of hentai manga it was prolly a spurr of the moment thing or related to series they've done (ex Musashi Quality translating a spice and wolf dojin). Saha is one that comes up alot on MU for instance.

As for the shounen/shojou ai, doesn't it sorta defeat the purpose of using them if it's under the explicit umbrella? Might as well put seinen and josei under there while we're at it. Why not just use the Yaoi/yuri tags seperately and put an explicit tag next to it if that content merits one o,o?
__________________

Last edited by babbo; 02-27-2009 at 06:21 PM.
babbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 06:13 PM   #19 (permalink)
Overlord
 
sothis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Age: 32
Posts: 15,988
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

so i do want to be clear that i dont consider shounen ai/shoujo ai or yaoi/yuri to be something bad or explicit by default - i simply figured that since yaoi/yuri by western definitions have heavy sex, that it would work as a subset of explicit (since 'sexual content' is also a subset)

but i can understand if people would prefer to have all genres separate. i had just hoped to avoid having to put explicit content for basically any title marked yaoi/yuri (since by western definition ie how we'll describe them, yaoi/yuri would mean heavy sexual content versus the more minimal 'sexual content')

so if people are very opposed to it being under the explicit bucket (for ease of use), please say so and ill do it this way instead:

Explicit Content
---Sexual Content
---Nudity

Yaoi
---Shounen-ai

Yuri
---Shoujo-ai

The Y/Y definitions in the first post are a bit misleading - I assumed that yaoi/yuri would only be tagged if the sexual content is 'heavy' meaning explicit. People can correct me if I'm wrong but based on the western definitions, I think that's a fair way of breaking it down between shounen/shoujo-ai (none to minor sexual content) versus yaoi/yuri (moderate to explicit). For this reason, for the most part I'd anticipate that most titles tagged yaoi or yuri would by default get 'explicit content', unless the submitter says there's just a moderate level (but again, base don my understanding,this wouldnt happen much?)

If explicit content is used, subtags dont need to be used (ie, sexual content and nudity). If explicit content is not used, sexual content or nudity would be used as needed.

sound good?
__________________

Anime-Planet.com - anime | manga | reviews

Adding Anime - Synopsis Templates | Twitter | MySpace

[sixth sense voice] I SEE BRITISH PEOPLE - Control my signature or avatar!
sothis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 07:48 PM   #20 (permalink)
MY DNA IS MADE UP OF ANIME
 
lagore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Freetown, USA
Posts: 4,218
Default Re: Proposed 'explicit content' type tags - round 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by sothis View Post
Well, let me start off by saying that I'm desperately sorry to say that I didn't read everything in the previous thread or this one, but I think I can still add something to the discussion.

EDIT: DAMMIT! See, see! I Because I came here late I missed a bunch od stuff. Dang it! Well... just disregard anything I wrote that's outdated by now.


Alright, so firstly, I think that this is a good idea. Maybe we can put a little box in the entry's corner with the pertinent information.

Secondly, I think that we should include hentai in our list, and therefor in our datadase (with proper warnings, or course). We already have entries like Kite and Mezzo Forte, and I think there are probably some other anime that are genuinely good, even if they have explicit sexual material. And even if they aren't, there is no requirement that all our entries be "good" shows.

Thirdly, I think that "panty-shots" is far too specific. It would be like having a category just for using the word "fuck" instead of all curse words. I propose using either "ecchi" or "mild sexual content."

Fourthly, I also think we should have a tag for verbal cursing. I know this would be kind of hard to enforce, what with the differences between fansubs, various official subs, and dubs. However, I think we should at least discuss this issue.

Fifthly, I think that "gore" and "explicit violence" are functionally the same thing.

Sixthly, I don NOT think that yuri and yaoi should be lumped together as sexual content. That would be like saying that any story with a heterosexual love story obviously involves sex. I'll admit that I don't know much about these genres, but I think that we would end up condemning some shows that have no sexual content whatsoever.

Finally, I think that if we use these tags/warning we absolutely NEED to have a page that definitely them. I don't think a parent would know what the heck "ecchi" means, and I think "adult themes" can be interpreted as having dozens of different meanings.

Okay! I think that's everything. Thanks for reading.
__________________

lagore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0