CoD: World at War

[Quizap]

Found out a some of my close friends play this online so I went ahead and bought it, was wondering if any of y'all do as well. PC version of course.

[Xennon]

I do. It is so god damn easy. If you have played cod4, the multiplayer is somewhat challenging, WaW for some reason is just easy ****. Anyways, my name is Eriom, just add me to your friends list. Although I hardly play, so if you want to play together, we'd have to arrange something.

[mussolini]

I play. Not so much any more, but I've been meaning to try out the new map-pack, so I'll probably get some MP and zombie-mode in over the weekend.

[shortlex]

I found the game at an internet cafe... I gotta go play it sometimes.

[Quizap]

I'm enjoying this one A LOT more then Modern Warfare. Don't know why, it's probably because I prefer WW2 over modernized weapons.

[Xennon]

The singleplayer for Modern Warfare is one of the ebst I have ever played in a game. Awesome singleplayer. The multiplayer is awesome as well. COD WAW was ok singleplayer wise. The Russian campaign was good, the American campaign was... eh. I mean, you picked the Pacific theater! There are some great battles, some very epic battles, but they hardly make any battle feel epic. It just felt like 5 guys were storming a Japanese fortress.

I mean, in Modern Warfare, when they were moving in on Al-Azad, You had tons of helicopters, and numerous tanks moving in. You'd drop off troops and they'd clear out buildings. It felt right. WaW didn't.

[Quizap]

Originally Posted by Xennon

The singleplayer for Modern Warfare is one of the ebst I have ever played in a game. Awesome singleplayer. The multiplayer is awesome as well. COD WAW was ok singleplayer wise. The Russian campaign was good, the American campaign was... eh. I mean, you picked the Pacific theater! There are some great battles, some very epic battles, but they hardly make any battle feel epic. It just felt like 5 guys were storming a Japanese fortress.

I mean, in Modern Warfare, when they were moving in on Al-Azad, You had tons of helicopters, and numerous tanks moving in. You'd drop off troops and they'd clear out buildings. It felt right. WaW didn't.

Ah, all I've done is the multiplayer for the most part. I'm thrilled that they actually used german and japanese voice overs for the NPCs but I"m very disappointed they used mainly english on all the ruskies. I personally think that when they do games like this, every voice over should be done in that countries language, even if you're playing something non english speaking, would make it feel that much more authentic.

[Quizap]

Alrighty, I'm LOVING the multiplayer for this, it's like a WW2 CS:S just with bigger maps, more accurate weapons that don't kill you 5 paces beyond a wall when being fired at down a different hall.

Well, more realistic ways in which the weapons work,t here's the recoil, how ifyou kill someone or shoot someone their weapon fires in a different direction etc. You know what I mean.

Now only if the Battlefield franchise could come up with something this realistic on massive battlefields etc. An Iwo Jima battlefield would be bad ass if they made something like that, or a D-Day. Have like the Germans start off in the middle along the beach head while 1 half of the allies starts in the boats and the other half starts spread out within enemy territory.

AHHHH it sounds so good but so difficult to actually make something like that.

[Xennon]

? Battlefield series, except 2142, is more realistic, than any COD series, except maybe MW.

Also, what is your name in game, I'll add you and whenever I hop on, i your on I can hop in and own...er play with you. Also, you better not play hardcore!

[Quizap]

I couldn't think of anything since I always have the word 'Fox' within my name so since I had just read someone's comment on After Story, Kyou, my favorite of the bunch jumped out at me, so the name on there is KyouFox