Quote:
Originally Posted by ace52387
Hm. I don't really understand why the celtics signed Rondo again. He would have been a restricted free agent in the summer where all kinds of stars would be free agents. Relatively speaking, he'd probably be low on the list 1, because he's not exactly an all-star just yet, and 2, because if anyone wanted to throw him an offer, they'd have to commit that money until the celtics decided if they would match or not, and if they do match, that week or whatever would go down the drain no?
It's a pretty big deal, 50 some million for 5 years. I think they could have signed him a little cheaper had they waited.
|
I think Rondo is the future though. Garnet/Pierce/Allen probably only have 1-2 maybe 3 years of top notch performance left in them.
I am wondering if they are going to take the same approach as Spurs with keeping a top notch point and look toward the future. I think Rondo is pretty amazing from here. During that fantastic series against the Bulls I felt he was the catalyst for the win.
I hear what your saying about the fact it does seem like they did not need to waste the money just yet.
Anyhow.
Celts are still undefeated right?